I am using this blog to record my genealogy research progress. My research at this point is concentrated in Tennessee, Virginia, Kentucky and Pennsylvania records. Since many of my ancestors ended up in the Midwest and West my research sometimes takes me in that direction. I also research Irish records.
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Share A Memory
Seeing a picture can jog your memory. This picture taken by the Temple swimming pool in Puente, California during the 1920's really brought back memories. The Temple Mansion was turned into a nursing home in the 1940's. My Grandfather Forgey worked there after WWII. My Grandmother Forgey was a resident of the modern nursing home built next to the Mansion in the 1960's. I used to walk the grounds of the nursing home with my father while my mother spent time with my grandmother. When I saw the picture above posted in my news feed at Facebook it really jolted me. I had never seen a picture of the pool from that era. I remember when I first noticed the old pool on one of my walks with my father. I was about 5 yrs. old and was fascinated by it. I couldn't believe it was a pool. I never saw one like it before. I've had dreams about swimming in that pool. Every time we visited my grandmother I had to look at the pool. My father said my Uncles swam in it. Don't know if that's true? (I also enjoyed looking at the old cemetery, also located on the grounds; which probably helped spark my interest in genealogy and love of cemeteries.)
I believe the Puente Hills can be seen in the background. I grew up at the base of those hills. I feel lucky that I was able to see the pool and other landmarks in the area before they were demolished. The pace of change in Southern California really sped up during my childhood in the 1960's and 1970's. You could still find unspoiled open spaces and farms near where I lived in the late 1960's early 1970's. We had terrible smog back then too. The smog situation is better now, but I do miss some of the old landmarks and the farms which were still around back then.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
My Sources so far on Owens
I've been busy getting up to speed on the Owens line this week. I've found some of the original material sited by other researchers. I still have more to find. I have not found any of the deeds I need online. The orphans court records are not online either. Another important document I need is the power of attorney which Thomas Broshears gave to James Owens regarding Hannah and John Owens estate.



Sources for James D. Owens and Francis
| 1843 Taxlist Bracken County |
- William is the son of James Owens comes from a taxlist which reads "William of James".
- William appears next to Francis his mother on taxlists.
- William is bondsman on Hannah's marriage bond. Hannah is found in on the Census in Francis's household.
- James and Francis children include Hannah, John, and David V. Owens. These names appear in the John and Susannah Owens family of PA and VA.
- A Broshears purchases an item from the James D. Owens estate.
- Hannah states her father was born in Pa on the 1880.
- Several of the Children of John and Susannah settle in Bracken County Ky. John and David seem to have settled not far away in the Clarksville area of Indiana. They were there in 1783.
| David and Brother John settled in Clarksville Indiana |
Sources John Owens Jr. and Susannah
- The proof that Susannah was John's wife comes from his 1781 Washington County, PA Will.
- The names of his children are said to come from Orphans court records. David and John are the only two mentioned by name on will. Otherwise it just states brothers and sisters of John and David.
- Their place of residence is Monongahela Ten mile Creek Virginia according to the will.
- John's aged mother is mentioned on the will but her name is not given
- A number of contemporary accounts give the cause of his death as the result of an indian attack
- John's brother David was said to be the son of an Indian trader according to several contemporary accounts. I have not seen John referred to as son of the Indian Trader.
- John owned land in Bedford County according to will.
- The fact Susannah remarried and her married name was McMullin is from her husband John's will documents.
- Susannah's death date of 1790 comes from her Washington County, PA will.
Sources for John Owens Sr.
- The first record for him I've found is as a witness to a treaty in 1752.
- He and his Indian wife also appear in a 1756 Pennsylvania Gazette article.
Saturday, September 15, 2012
Shopping using 1825 Family Inventory
![]() |
| Coffee Mill |
![]() |
| Trundle Bed |
Wondered if I could reproduce the household goods listed on James D. Owens March 1825 Inventory? I was able to find most of the objects referred to. I had no idea what a Trammel was until looking that up. You would attach your dutch oven to the trammel in your fireplace to cook. I had a vague idea of what a Trundle Bed was. The 1825 trundle bed was a small bed which could slide under a larger one; very handy in cramped living quarters. The Owens family lived on the Ohio River so they had both a boat and a scift or skiff. I guess someone in the family could read because they did have books. I wondered about the log chains. I noticed nearly everyone had those but I had no idea how they were used until now. Apparently they were wrapped around logs so you could move them? Some of the items I couldn't make out or identify. I think I would have been lost regarding some of the items, and would have to have some schooling on how to use them.
Friday, September 14, 2012
Shifting Gears
| Hannah Daughter of James D and Francis may be key |
The question I am trying to answer is who are James D. Owens parents? He was born between 1775 and 1780 in Pennsylvania. Are they John and Hannah Owens of 10 Mile Creek PA?
There were two James Owens in Bracken County, KY who were about the same age, and either could be the son of John and Hannah.
| Turtle Creek |
The 5 C's for success in genealogy webinar also emphasized the importance of extracting every clue you have. It's important to gather everything you've collected and analyse it, and put it to work to solve your problem. You really have to milk it for every clue. I have collected most of the traditional source documents. James D Owens died intestate and his wife was appointed administrator. I wasn't able glean James relationship to the other Owens families in the area using these documents. I also have tax lists for Bracken County which do not state relationships to the other Owens families either.
As Barbara Renick stated proximity of other families can point to a relationship. She pointed out that finding someone listed next to your family on the Census meant they most likely lived near to you ancestors. I found that James Owens was listed 3 pages from the nearest Owens family which was that of George Owens. So they weren't next door but likely not too far away. With a common name like Owens it's hard to make these differentiations.
| Locust Creek where red pin is |
| James D. Owens Bracken County, KY 1810 |
| James D. Owens Bracken County, KY 1820 |
| Francis Owens Bracken County, KY 1830 |
| Francis Owens Bracken County, KY 1840 |
Francis Owens Bracken County, KY 1850
| Francis Owens Bracken County, KY 1860 |
| Hannah Hicks Daughter of James D. and Francis 1880 Census |
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Distant Versus Remote Cousins Family Finder
Monday, August 27, 2012
IBS and Autosomal DNA?
Genealogy and Autosomal DNA may contribute to IBS (Irritable bowel syndrome) but this acronym has another meaning. Identical by state means your sharing a common DNA segment in your autosomal DNA is just a coincidence, and you are not actually related to the person. Too weed out some of these matches and find out whether you are actually related IBD (Identical by descent or you both inherit that segment from a common ancestor) we bring in another acronym SNP (single nucleotide polymorphisms) which are copying errors. If you share at least 500 SNPs, or over, on a segment of shared DNA than you are likely related or IBD.
I went back to my Owens match to check whether we were IBD on the two matching segments. Yes we were. Both were over 500 SNPs
At gedmatch I was able to find cousins who shared a common ancestor at 11 and 12 generations back in Quebec. I noticed the segments I shared with them were IBD, but the segment sizes are generally in the 3cM range. I believe two where in the 5 cM range. This is just one example.
I went back to my Owens match to check whether we were IBD on the two matching segments. Yes we were. Both were over 500 SNPs
At gedmatch I was able to find cousins who shared a common ancestor at 11 and 12 generations back in Quebec. I noticed the segments I shared with them were IBD, but the segment sizes are generally in the 3cM range. I believe two where in the 5 cM range. This is just one example.
| Our shared Ancestry which is back in the 1600's |
So my learning process continues.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Support for my Hypothesis from autosomal DNA match
| The Tenmile Country and Its Pioneer Families: A Genealogical History |
I need to try to unearth something more about these women now in order to possibly solve these brickwalls with the autosomal DNA. Have not been able to find the parents or maiden names in two cases of these women:
- Sarah Campbell born 1812 in possibly Tennessee or North Carolina married Anderson Wray 15 Nov 1832 in Jackson County, Indiana
- Eve Urma born about 1800 in Virginia or Pennsylvania married Jesse Callahan 5 Oct 1814 in Washington County, IN. She may be related to the Urmey family in the same area?
- Francis Unknown born abt. 1785 PA married James D. Owens of Bracken County, Kentucky don't know where or when they marriage took place? Some names which appeared with her in her husbands probate were Aquilla Houke, William Orr, John McMillen, Benjamin Laughlin ( I may have a Houke match?).
- Rachel Unknown b. unknown married to Roger Browning b. 6 Dec 1751 of Greene County, Tennessee
I shared a 25.5 cM block with a Williamson family who lived in Franklin County, Indiana. I am wondering if this match relates to one of these brickwalls? I wonder if several of my matches at FT DNA relate to one of these lines?
Here is my transcription of tax lists for Bracken County, KY. George Owens also named in John Owens will appears with James.
1797 Taxlist for Bracken County, Kentucky
---------------------------------------------------------------------
David Owens (Indian Killer?)
1799 Taxlist
---------------------------------------------------------------------
George Owens
James Owens
1802 Taxlist
---------------------------------------------------------------------
James Owens
George Owens
Thomas Owens
1803 Taxlist
--------------------------------------------------------------------
George Owens
Thomas Owens
James Owens
1804 Taxlist
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Two James Owens now appear one described as Senior the other Junior
George Owens
Thomas Owens
1810 Taxlist
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
My Ancestor is first recorded as James D. Owens paid tax on
July 31 along with George and Thomas Owens
The other James Owens paid on another day
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Autosomal DNA What does cM stand for? Plus my current match total
| If you share a block in the same location with several matches you likely share a common ancestor. This is true even if the blocks overlap each other. |
The easiest way to understand the FT DNA autosomal results is to start with a definition of cM. It's a genetic measurement and it measures genetic distance. According to Wikipedia "A centimorgan (cM) is a unit that describes a recombination frequency of 1%. In this way we can measure the genetic distance between two loci, based upon their recombination frequency." When you are using the Chromosome browser at FT DNA the higher the cM number you select the larger the segments will be for comparison. 5 cM and over signifies a relationship, and over 10 cM conclusive proof of a relationship. The shared cM numbers on your match pages present a different indicator. The higher the number of shared cM in the match section of your results signifies a higher likelihood of recombination for the shared block. The higher the likelihood of recombination the more likely your match is a close relative. Lower shared cM numbers mean that segment does not recombine as often so your match may be more distant in time. I found this page at FT DNA to be the best explanation of the whole autosomal DNA process http://www.familytreedna.com/faq/answers/default.aspx?faqid=17
So the most important numbers to remember are:
- The longest block. The longer the block the more likely you are to be related.
- Shared cM. The higher this number the more likely your relationship is recent (closer cousin) a lower number could mean your match shares a more distant relationship with you (more distant cousin).
- The Chromo Browser setting number relates to the size of the shared block. The higher the number you set it to the larger segment will be for comparison to one or more matches. You may share many smaller segments of DNA with someone also, so you can set the browser to show segments as low as 1 cM.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Working those Autosomal Results
I received my Autosomal DNA test result last Friday exactly 3 weeks after they received my test kit.
![]() |
| This is my personal knowledge of my ethnicity |
I've uploaded my raw data files from FT DNA to Promethease and Gedmatch. I also got a BGA report from Doug McDonald which gives me a little more insight into my possible ethnic roots.
I have not had much success with Gedmatch so far. This site helps you find possible autosomal match cousins. I initially just uploaded my raw files and got only one match. When I later uploaded a gedcom file I got 503 matches. Most proved to be not significant. Could not find a common ancestor with most. I did find more French Canadian cousins.
I picked up some information about how these DNA percentages tend to correlate with your ancestors. According to The Genetic Genealogist great-grandparents contribute about 12% to your DNA.
What I have learned is you need to use traditional genealogy and family knowledge to put these results into the correct context. I am very pleased with my results so far. The test has been well worth the cost for me.
Here are examples of the reports I received from Doug McDonald:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





